top of page
Search

EU Trade Deal Update


ree


With the August 1 trade deadline just days away, the United States and the European Union agreed to a basic trade framework. It’s not a final deal—it’s more like a promise to keep working together. The markets barely reacted: stocks stayed flat Monday and dipped slightly Tuesday. Still, this agreement helped ease a lot of uncertainty.


For business owners and people getting close to retirement, this is a good moment to focus on what matters: how policy changes create winners, losers—and most importantly, how they affect long‑term planning.


What Is in the Agreement?


Announced on July 27, the deal includes these main points:

  • The U.S. will charge a 15% tariff on most goods imported from the EU (like cars, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals), half the feared 30% rate but still higher than before (reuters.com, reuters.com).

  • Steel and aluminum from Europe will still face 50% tariffs unless future quotas are negotiated (whitehouse.gov).

  • The EU has committed to:

    • Buy $750 billion in U.S. energy products (LNG, oil, possibly nuclear) over the next three years (whitehouse.gov, reuters.com).

    • Invest $600 billion in the U.S. economy in the same period (whitehouse.gov).

  • Other pledges include removing some EU tariffs on U.S. goods, reducing red tape, and offering more access for U.S. farm and digital exports (whitehouse.gov).


But most details are vague and nonbinding—there’s a lot left to work out.


Why the $750 Billion Energy Promise Seems Unlikely


Replacement of Russian Supply


One big goal is to replace Russian gas and oil in Europe. Back in 2021, about 45% of EU gas came from Russia, but by 2023 that had dropped to around 15% thanks to REPowerEU energy reforms (en.wikipedia.org). Still, EU imports of Russian fuel in 2024 were only about $25 billion—far below the annual target of $250 billion needed to reach $750 billion over three years (reuters.com, discoveryalert.com.au).


Too Ambitious for the Market


In 2024, EU imports of U.S. energy totaled approximately $65 billion (crude oil, LNG, coal), so tripling that to $250 billion per year is seen by many analysts as unrealistic (reuters.com).


Private Market, Not Government-Controlled


Energy supply and trade are run by private companies—not by EU governments. So while EU leaders can say they want to buy $750 billion, they can't order companies to do it—and existing U.S. exporters supply global markets based on contracts—not political decrees (foxbusiness.com).


In short: Even though the EU said it wants to buy $750 billion in U.S. energy to reform Russian reliance, the scale and logistics of that promise are likely unfeasible.


Why the $600 Billion EU Investment in the U.S. Also Seems Unlikely


The deal also says that the EU will invest $600 billion in the U.S. economy through 2028. That sounds impressive—but again, when we dig deeper, it’s probably more of a political talking point than a realistic economic plan.


Who Is Actually Making the Investment?


The European Union, as a government body, doesn’t have the kind of budget that can make those investments. According to the EU’s 2021–2027 financial framework, the total budget is around €1.2 trillion—most of which goes to agriculture, regional development, and administrative costs (EU Commission). That leaves little room for a giant U.S. investment spree.


That raises a big question: Who exactly is promising to invest this money? Is it European companies? National governments? Private investors? The deal doesn’t say. And in free-market economies, governments don’t tell private companies where to invest. The decision to put money into U.S. factories, real estate, or tech firms depends on individual business cases—not handshakes between presidents.


A History of Similar Investment Levels


According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, the EU already invests over $100 billion per year in the U.S.—including through real estate purchases, business expansions, and corporate acquisitions (BEA.gov). So over four years, hitting $600 billion isn’t necessarily new—it’s just continuing current trends, not something dramatically above normal.


In other words, the EU may not be pledging to increase investments but rather repackaging current levels as part of this deal.


Why It Matters to Markets


This distinction is important because investors want clarity. If the $600 billion is mostly smoke and mirrors, then it won’t deliver new economic growth or job creation. Markets respond to real growth prospects—not vague promises.


Markets Care About Expectations, Not Politics


Debates continue in Europe:

But for markets, the key question isn’t politics—it’s economic impact. In April, investors priced in fears of rising tariffs and trade conflict, triggering a correction. Now that tariffs are capped at 15% instead of 30%, things are better than feared—even if still restrictive (apnews.com, reuters.com, reuters.com).


When outcomes are less bad than expected, markets tend to react positively—or at least stabilize.


What This Means for You


1. Stick to Your Long-Term Financial Plan


This agreement is already mostly priced in. Sudden portfolio moves now may lock in losses or cause missed gains. Stay aligned with your broader goals.


2. Expect Sector Shifts


Some industries may feel effects more strongly. Diversifying can help manage sector-specific ups and downs.


3. Uncertainty Can Be a Window


Periods of change are opportunities. If you’re nearing retirement or planning a business exit, reviewing liquidity, tax, and investment strategies now may pay off later.


4. Focus on Economic Fundamentals


Ultimately, company profits, consumer behavior, and investment trends matter most. Trade frameworks may provide clearer paths—but results unfold over months or years.


Bottom Line


This U.S.–EU framework isn’t a finished trade agreement. Instead, it brings reduced uncertainty—and that's enough for markets to relax. With tariffs capped at 15% instead of threatened 30%, and at least a roadmap to negotiation, businesses and investors get more stability.


For business owners and pre‑retirees, the takeaway is simple: stay strategic, stay diversified, and let data—not the headlines—drive decisions.


About The Author

Marc Lowe is the Founder & President of In The Money Retirement Planning. He is a Certified Financial Planner and member of NAPFA National Association of Personal Financial Advisors, XY Planning Network & Fee-Only Network. He works with retirees and those approaching retirement. He has over a decade of experience helping these folks grow their net worth, organize their finances and build better lives for themselves and their families.

picture of financial planner
CEO & Founder of In The Money Retirement Planning




The information presented in this Presentation is the opinion of the author and does not reflect the views of any other person or entity unless specified. The information provided is believed to be reliable and obtained from reliable sources, but no liability is accepted for inaccuracies. The information provided is for informational purposes and should not be construed as advice. Advisory services offered through In The Money Retirement, an investment adviser registered with the state of Connecticut. The information linked to on third-party sites is being provided strictly as a  courtesy and convenience. When you link to any of the web sites provided here, you are leaving this website. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these websites. When you access these websites, you are leaving our website and assume any and all responsibility and risk for use of the web sites you are visiting.The tax and estate planning information offered by the advisor is general in nature. It is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal or tax advice. Always consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific legal or tax situation.



Comments

bottom of page